Archive for December, 2010

RefWorks Trial – Volunteers Wanted

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

Jenny Coombs, Faculty Team Leader in Science and Engineering, who attended one of our recent social media sessions, informs me of a three month trial of RefWorks, the bibliographic management software, to take place in the New Year. Any researchers at the University interested in volunteering can contact Jenny at

Navigation in City and Online Space

Sunday, December 12th, 2010

The main event of New Research Trajectories is happening this coming Wednesday, 15 December in Nottingham City Centre, with a range of activities by postgraduate students from universities across the East Midlands. Download the poster and see the website for more information.


Friday, December 10th, 2010

Image: REUTERS / Andrew Winning

Mediated Diagnosis: Cluster Headaches and YouTube

Thursday, December 9th, 2010

“Medical information has been described as no longer being bound to medical institutions, but as having “escaped” into society at large by means of media and most notably new media.”

(Mager, 2009; 1123)

In her very interesting article – Mediated Health: Sociotechnical practices of providing and using online health information – Astrid Mager uses Actor-Network Theory to examine the user-provider relationship in online health information. Reading it reminded me of recent personal experience.

From the age of sixteen, I have suffered from recurring headaches. Attacks last 2 to 3 hours, and occur once, twice or occasionally several times a day. The pain is located exclusively on the left-side of my head, centred behind my eye. It’s nothing like a migraine – I don’t feel sick, or get irritated by background noise or bright lights. It’s nothing like the dull or nagging pain of a normal headache, but rather like being stabbed continuously in the eyeball. Attacks have made me cry, scream, roll on the floor, and carry out irrational acts of self-inflicted injury – during one attack, I belted my head so hard against the door to my room I made a crack in it (the door, not my head). Even the strongest prescription painkillers have barely any effect.

It was initially diagnosed as sinusitis. I was prescribed antibiotics and after 2 to 3 weeks the condition disappeared. Subsequent episodes (again lasting several weeks) occurred every few months or so. Gradually the gap between these episodes increased to a year, then several years. My last episode was five years ago (and counting!) Since that original diagnosis, I’ve changed location several times and with it, my GP. None of them ever witnessed me having an attack, or really questioned the original diagnosis. It wasn’t until my most recent episode, whilst studying in Cornwall, that the doctor actually took the time to enquire more thoroughly into the nature of my attacks. He suggested I had been suffering all this time from cluster headaches (which I had never heard of before). He still proceeded to give me a course of antibiotics – for my own reassurance rather than any belief they’d help – and I endured this latest series of attacks for a few more weeks, as normal.

But the significance of this new diagnosis was that it coincided with, for the first time, my access to an increasingly populated source of information – the web – which over subsequent years has multiplied through various forums, networks and online support groups. Sure enough, everything I read online about cluster headaches, from medical reports to sufferers’ own experiences, seemed to relate very closely to my condition: the one-sidedness, the episodic nature of attacks, and the intensity of the pain.

In a quotation on Wikipedia, Professor of Clinical Neurology and headache specialist Dr. Peter Goadsby remarks:

“Cluster headache is probably the worst pain that humans experience. I know that’s quite a strong remark to make, but if you ask a cluster headache patient if they’ve had a worse experience, they’ll universally say they haven’t. Women with cluster headache will tell you that an attack is worse than giving birth.”

I realise self-diagnosis from potentially unreliable sources – not least on the web – can be irresponsible and even dangerous. In my case, it wasn’t self-diagnosis as such, rather following up on a diagnosis provided by a medical professional. But all the same, even given the overwhelming evidence, I was still cautious in questioning what I had been led to believe for many years. However, what has clinched it for me has been the emergence of a significant number of videos posted on YouTube by sufferers willing to share recordings taken of them during a cluster headache attack. Here’s a couple:

Watching these for the first time was a revelation – the rolling back and forth, the cradling of the head, the pacing up and down, the involuntary crying out – it was all frighteningly familiar. These videos and others like them hardly constitute a definitive diagnosis for my own condition, but as visual and explicit mediated experiences, they are highly persuasive. Even after repeated viewings, they bring me out in a cold sweat.

I don’t blame the GP who made the initial misdiagnosis, nor the subsequent doctors for not challenging it. It appears medical knowledge about cluster headaches was, until only very recently, largely restricted to specialists. The online forums are full of people recounting misdiagnoses of sinusitis and migraine.

I’ve been free of this for five years now, and have no idea if and when I’ll get another episode. But I know if I do, it should only last for a few weeks. Whilst I’ve suffered this over many years, I think of myself as being extremely fortunate. As an episodic sufferer, with increasingly long remission periods, my experience is insignificant compared to chronic sufferers. I cannot even begin to imagine how they manage to live with this debilitating condition on a daily basis. I only hope that the shared advice and discussion that is evident on the web provides at least some support.


Mager, A. (2009). Mediated health: sociotechnical practices of providing and using online health information. New Media & Society, 11(7), 1123-1142.

Still Time…

Saturday, December 4th, 2010

“Nobody grasped you by the shoulder while there was still time. Now the clay of which you were shaped has dried and hardened, and nothing in you will ever awaken the sleeping musician, the poet, the astronomer that possibly inhabited you in the beginning.”

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (1939)

de Saint-Exupéry, A. (1939). Terre des Hommes. Paris: Gallimard.

Web 2.0: Reflective and Critical Practices

Thursday, December 2nd, 2010

The postgraduate and early career researchers who have attended the social media sessions I’ve been running with LeRoy Hill over the last year bring with them rich and wide-ranging learning experiences and perspectives.

Some might have been under the impression that we are on some sort of crusade with web 2.0, but we are not. It’s always been about raising awareness of its potential. We recognise that the values of these tools are highly situated in each researcher’s individual practice and disciplinary research culture, and many attendees are rightly apprehensive over the appropriateness and usefulness of social media in their studies and work. We welcome current users who share their social media practices with other attendees, often supporting our enthusiasm with fresh and unique perspectives. But we are equally happy for them to share bad experiences, misconceptions and concerns. This is why we try to encourage an interactive environment and opportunities for discussion.

I can’t speak for LeRoy (though I think he’d agree), but I’m happy for attendees to go away choosing not to adopt any or all of the social media we discuss, as long as the sessions have given them the opportunity to reflect on their own use, or potential use, of these tools, and encouraged them to think critically about their applicability to their own practices and the wider contexts of web 2.0.

This approach also informs and underpins the modes of enquiry and analytical model I am developing for my current PhD work with doctoral students. But what do we mean by critical and reflective practices? Both draw on rich historical and contested models and definitions, which I will not attempt to review here. Rather, I’d like to suggest how these (in my view, often interrelated) practices should be embedded in the processes postgraduate researchers adopt in using social media.

Reflective Practices

  • Identifying appropriate web 2.0 resources and services, and evaluating the affordances of specific tools and platforms for academic practice
  • Developing self- and collaborative organisational and time-management skills in relation to social media use, including the use of technology-supported strategies
  • Identifying appropriate technical know-how and training needs, and using training opportunities (formal and informal), online resources and other sources of support
  • Recognising the transferability of web 2.0 skills and digital literacies in lifelong learning, professional development and employability contexts
  • Engaging in opportunities for sharing practice and technological skills with peers
  • Developing potential for individual, participatory and collaborative action planning and learning design

Critical Practices

  • Negotiating new socio-technical academic community and network development and boundary-crossing activities within disciplinary and interdisciplinary contexts
  • Recognising shifts in academic protocols; new modes and means of production, peer review and knowledge resources
  • Adapting to new practices in academic integrity and responsibility; referencing and attribution of digital sources and artefacts
  • Identifying inconsistent pedagogies and socio-cultural and political ideologies that underpin social media practice
  • Challenging rhetorical representation of social media historically founded in the business metaphor of web 2.0
  • Negotiating increasingly blurred boundaries defining institutional, proprietary, freeware and open-source tools and platforms
  • Understanding emerging multimedia and multimodal literacies
  • Managing online identities and reputation